|
Savings:
No other stretch wrap method can beat its overall cost efficiency.
Call 1.800.387.5001 for a free analysis of your projected savings.
An Investment in Yellow Jacket Can Mean Big Savings! $$$ |
|
YJ vs Hand Wrapping |
Savings $1.75 to $2.10 |
YJ vs Turntable Wrapping |
Savings $ .75 to $ .90 |
YJ vs Banding |
Savings $2.00 to $5.00 |
YJ vs Hand Wrap & Banding |
Savings $4.75 to $8.00 |
| YJ vs Turntable & Banding |
Savings $3.75 to $6.76 |
Note: Does not include costs associated with wood, corrugated or other types of guarding and the labor time to position them. |
These are hard costs only. In addition, estimates for worker’s compensation claims, damage to goods due to damage in transit, loss due to theft, and the small tools and supplies required for other wrapping methods.
All parameters are based on industry averages. A more exact analysis can be done using the specific information that applies to your wrapping method vs. Yellow Jacket.
Listen to what customers are saying about Yellow Jacket savings:

Haas Automation |
“The Yellow Jacket 110 enabled Haas Automation to effectively streamline their pallet preparation process from a 2 person/5 minute job to a single person/1 minute job. Haas Automation quickly realized their return-on-investment,” McKenna clarifies. “We calculated that the Yellow Jacket saves us the work of half of a person, or a yearly savings $20,000. This machine is a great return-on-investment, easily paying for itself within 2 years.” Click here for full story...
— Joe McKenna, Machine Shop Manager for Haas Automation, Oxnard, California

John Hill, Manager for Equalizer Systems, using the Yellow Jacket stretch wrapper for their already boxed equipment. |

Staber Industries |
“I would say it paid for itself the first day we got it due to reduced headaches (due to worrying about getting product out day to day) and backaches/injuries from manual operations. And this is important to use mainly because of how quick we have grown … and the expectation for continued growth trends. It freed us up as far as man power, and that’s saved us a lot of money in saved labor costs…probably somewhere in the tens of thousands of dollars annually when considering both labor and shipping problems.” Click here for full story...
— John Hill, Shipping Manager for Equalizer Systems, Elkhart, Indiana
“Do the math, if it takes about five minutes for one man to pick up a pallet with the forklift, put the load into the stretch wrap system, wrap it, and then put the secured load in the shipping area; based on 14 loads per day, that's 70 minutes of labor costs. With the old steel banding method, it took two men 15 minutes. That's 420 minutes or 7 hours of labor costs. Figuring labor at a round average of $20 per hour (including labor and benefit costs), as well as material usage, the new system allows us to save at least $180 per day or nearly $1,000 in labor costs per week." Click here for full story...
— Bill Staber, President of Staber Industries, Groveport, Ohio

Numerous pallet shapes
and sizes at Tri-State Fabricators, Inc. |
“The system has already paid for itself in labor costs savings alone,” With the new stretch wrap system, less fuel and maintenance is required for forklift operation. ‘When you look at what we save by no longer purchasing additional pallets, less forklift fuel and maintenance, major manpower cuts, and the ability to get far more out the door, it all adds up.’ Tri-State Fabricators Vice-President of Sales, Rick Vogt, calculates that it took less than six months to realize a complete return on investment.” Click here for full story...
— Jack Deimling, Shipping Manager for Tri-State Fabricators, Cincinnati, Ohio
|